Nationally, what gaps in their ability to help survivors do DV advocates experience when they limit their help to legal information, not legal advice?
Advocates are restricted in the services they can provide to survivors, and it is sometimes difficult for advocates to connect survivors to attorneys. When DV advocates are not able to provide legal advice, many survivors do not receive legal help because there is no help available. DV advocates are often the only help a survivor can get because there are not enough attorneys available. There is a lack of intermediary legal assistance options between expensive lawyers and legal aid further preventing advocates from being able to refer survivors to legal assistance.
Advocates are restricted in the services they can provide to survivors, and it is sometimes difficult for advocates to connect survivors to attorneys.
For some advocates, being restricted from giving legal advice creates tension between what they know and what they are permitted to do.
Advocates and organization leaders acknowledged that there are simply not enough attorneys to meet the needs of survivors and it is difficult to make referrals to attorneys. Helpful legal aid services and pro bono attorneys to help survivors with their civil legal needs do exist. However, these services are often inaccessible to survivors due to the services not having the capacity to take on cases, or the survivor not meeting the financial requirements to qualify for help. Additionally, many outside organizations who might otherwise be able to help are over capacity overwhelmed.
When survivors have to go to outside resources to address their civil legal needs it can be frustrating because it prolongs the process. This includes that the outside services are often at capacity.
Many organizations and advocates are not able to make referrals to attorneys for all survivors because there are not enough available attorneys. DV advocates provide many important services to survivors and act as a resource to guide survivors through court-involved processes.
Legal aid is not able to serve all eligible survivors. Furthermore, a number of survivors make too much money to qualify for legal aid, but not enough to be able to pay bills and an attorney. There are very few attorneys available to provide services to the individuals in this income range.
When DV advocates make referrals to attorneys, the advocate risks putting the survivor in a situation where they are re-traumatized: not all legal system actors are trained in trauma-informed practices and using trauma-informed procedures.
Survivors are put at further risk of retraumatization when they interact with court system actors that are not implementing trauma-informed procedures when hearing a DV case.
DV advocates know that survivors who attempt to navigate the legal system without help will frequently be confused and overwhelmed.
There are many hoops for the survivors to jump through when navigating the civil legal system. It is also difficult for a survivor to narrow down the facts of their situation to present to a court. Advocates can assist survivors navigate the system.
Advocates are attempting to support survivors without counsel in a landscape where abusers often have counsel and are leveraging the legal system to perpetuate the abuse cycle.
By design, the legal system requires the survivor to face their abuser in person. There are also many cases where the abuser is able to secure legal representation, but the survivor is not. Or there are situations where the abuser brings frivolous lawsuits against the survivor as a means of power and control.
Survivors often ask advocates to provide legal advice, despite advocates not being authorized to do so.
Most advocates indicated they are asked legal questions every day or almost every day. Survivors come to advocates expecting them to be able to answer their questions.
Advocates have to carefully walk the line of legal advice and legal information when trying to answer a civil legal question for a survivor, paying close attention to the scope of what they are allowed to help with.
Survivors already ask advocates legal questions, but because of current UPL restrictions, advocates are unable to give them more than information about their options. This presents challenges because many survivors are in crisis which impacts their decision-making abilities. Advocates’ descriptions of navigating the distinction between legal information and legal advice indicates that capping services at legal information often fails to meet survivors’ true legal needs.
The line between legal information and legal advice is blurry, causing advocates to vary in their reaction when a survivor asks a question that might elicit legal advice. Advocates range in their level of confidence when walking the line between legal advice and legal information.
The line between providing legal information and legal advice is blurry at best. There is no common definition of what constitutes legal advice and DV system actors sometimes take an “I’ll know it when I see it approach” to determining whether an action or statement constitutes providing legal advice.
Some advocates walk right up to the line.
Other advocates stay as far away from providing legal advice as possible.
Advocates’ confidence depends on the legal issue and the question posed by the survivor.
Tension exists for advocates when survivors ask them questions that they know the answer to, but are not permitted to answer because it would constitute providing legal advice, exacerbating the frustration that survivors feel when navigating the legal system.
When survivors ask questions that lend themselves to legal advice, advocates have to explain that they can’t answer these questions because they aren’t attorneys, and it can be tense for both parties.
Advocates frequently have to set boundaries or limits with survivors about what their role entails and explain that they cannot provide legal advice.
Advocates have to explain their role to survivors, stressing that they are not attorneys and cannot give legal advice.
When advocates are unable to provide legal advice to survivors, they feel like they are letting survivors down.
Advocates want to help survivors as much as possible. Advocates feel like they could be doing more in many cases if they were permitted to provide legal advice.
Some advocates are worried about leading a survivor down the wrong path by providing legal advice because they would then feel responsible for the survivor’s actions.
Several advocates indicated they were hesitant to give survivors legal advice because they did not want to do anything that could damage the survivor’s case. Advocates want to help survivors, not hurt them by providing incorrect legal advice.
Advocates navigate additional barriers when survivors are not represented; courts treat self-represented survivors differently than represented survivors.
Advocates do their best to bridge this gap for survivors and reach attorneys to help survivors when possible.